Latest News

We have recently written extensively about payments and compliance for tokenized US stocks. It has been a while since we returned to our core area of expertise: crypto licensing.

In the first two pieces of this payments series, CryptoLicense looked at card networks and banks. Card networks are changing the settlement layer: Visa is using USDC for settlement, and Mastercard spent USD 1.8 billion to acquire BVNK as a bridge.

The market is heating up, but the models differ sharply. Binance is using the FSRA prospectus route in Abu Dhabi. Bitget relies on Alpaca as broker and custodian for the underlying shares,

In the previous piece, the CryptoLicense team looked at how Visa and Mastercard are connecting to stablecoins: the card networks are changing the settlement layer by embedding on-chain capabilities into existing payment networks.

Recently, the CryptoLicense team attended Money 20/20 in Bangkok. The shift in conversation was unmistakable: crypto payments had become one of the dominant topics, drawing more interest than we had anticipated.

When most people think about crypto-friendly jurisdictions, Singapore and Dubai come to mind first. But a smaller, less obvious name has been quietly entering the conversation this year: Bhutan.

When most people think about crypto-friendly jurisdictions, Singapore and Dubai come to mind first. But a smaller, less obvious name has been quietly entering the conversation this year: Bhutan.

In our previous blog posts, we have discussed various popular cryptocurrency licenses including MiCA CASP, the Swiss SRO, Abu Dhabi’s ADGM, and the evolving Polish VASP framework.

At CryptoLicense, the most frequent inquiry we field is a deceptively simple one: "Which crypto license should I apply for?" Our response is always a series of follow-up questions: Where are your users? Is your business model an exchange, a wallet, or a custody service? Where is your core team based?